![]() Perhaps, what is new here is the application of the method at European scale and the damage curves. Many works in literature (included some of those cited by the paper) assessed the water depth by overlaying road links and flood footprint I would say this is a “normal procedure” of spatial analysis at urban scale. Despite I value the work in its nature, my review is critical because it identified these flaws that appeared straightforward to me.ġ) What is has been defined as “object-based” approach is NOT a new approach. However, I find also major issues that I outline below. I recognise the multi-institutional and -discipline effort, as well as the European scale of it. Overall, this is a very interesting and complex case study. Suggestions for revision or reasons for rejection I look forward to receiving the revised version of your manuscript. Please also note that this decision does not necessarily imply acceptance of the manuscript in the journal NHESS, and it still will depend on your reply (and subsequent edits to your manuscript) to referees comments, as well as on the reviewer comments of the revised version. If you have any questions regarding the procedure or interpretation of the comments, please do not hesitate to contact me for clarification. Additionally, you have to upload the new version of the manuscript. Further, the reviewers provided detailed reports highlighting all the points you should address in the revisions to make the paper stronger.Īccording to your responses, I am very positive about the new version of the manuscript and that you will take up their remarks.Īs a next step, please upload the revised marked up (track changes) version of your manuscript. According to the referees' recommendations, I decide on major revisions of your manuscript. Two referee reports are available which raise important issues regarding the comprehensibility of your approach, the reasoning for assumptions, and clarity of presentation. Thank you very much again for submitting your interesting manuscript ''Direct flood risk assessment of the European road network: an object-based approach' to NHESS. Please contact the relevant IfATE product manager if you have any queries about a specific case.Dear Kees C.H. As this means elements of this report will become out of date before the next version is published, please note that the most up to date position relating to any apprenticeship can always be seen on the webpage relating to that standard. We will aim to publish the next version of this report in early June 2023. The report does not include apprenticeships that are currently the subject of an IfATE route review unless that review has been completed and the revision work already commenced. Alternatively, it may occasionally mean that the plan to revise or adjust the standard has been reversed or paused. If so, this will be reflected on the webpage relating to that standard. If an apprenticeship that was listed on the last report no longer appears on this version, this is normally because the revised or adjusted version is now live. New cases added since the previous edition are marked as yellow and cases that have progressed to a new stage (or returned to a previous stage) are marked as orange. The report includes the email address of the relevant product manager for each case in revision. This can be done via the relevant IfATE product manager when the occupational standard and EPA plan are submitted for approval (Stage 2 in the report below). The report also provides an opportunity to input views on a suitable notice period for the introduction of a revised version in place of a current version for new starts (more minor “adjustments” tend not to require notice periods). These change categories are defined in our “Change Requests” guidance. What were previously defined as “revisions” now encompass both revisions and more minor changes known as “adjustments”. states the stage that each revision or adjustment has reached. ![]() provides a brief overview of the revisions and adjustments planned for each apprenticeship and. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |